Horrible Bosses

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, become a fan of my facebook page! The Film Code Page!

This story follows three men; Nick Hendricks, Dale Arbus, and Kurt Buckman. Each of them are forced to work with a horrible that is making their lives miserable. One night, over drinks, they decide to try and murder their horrible bosses. With the help of a murder consultant they attempt to murder their bosses.

This film was directed by Seth Gordon, who is developing a name in comedy. This is a unique comedic film that is based off something that everyone can relate to. This was tastefully done, and had a slightly surprising ending. There was some toilet humour, but it wasn't overplayed. The opening was a good lead in since it gave you an introduction to the characters and their bosses. Sometimes the characters were a bit over the top taking their roles to the extremes. Having the police involved in the manner that they did was well done. This film doesn't follow the format seen in other recent comedic films like the Hangover, or Hallpass. So, I will come out and say that I can not agree with most other film critics. This film has a selective comedic audience. This film was mainly made for the average working person. I think that's what makes the film really original is that it doesn't use a drunken, or drugged, idiot as the leading character. A lot of comedy comes from it reliability from the average working person. This film also wasn't meant to be dark, because it's a comedy. That's why the character's don't come out as a angry drunken men murdering people at random-that would make it a horror or a thriller. Sure, there is a lot of things in it that appear to play to the stereotypical gender roles, and is racist, and possibly against gays, but these features all appear (in some way) in every comedic film of the time. It is brought out to satirize it. I would not go so far as to say that's its the greatest comedic film of the year, but it's funnier than some of the other films I've seen.

The acting was good. It made several highly believable characters. I also believe that the actors who played the bosses just had fun with their roles (even if it was taken highly over the top). Jason Bateman played the role of Nick Hendricks. He is the man working in the office waiting for his next promotion, and is working for the psycho. He was great in this role creating a highly believable character. Charlie Day played the role of Dale Arbus. This film brought him out of the television screen and onto the film screen. His character is the man who dreams of being the perfect husband, but he works for the man-eater. He is good in this film becoming a character that discovers he has a backbone. Jason Sudeikis plays the role of Kurt Buckman. He is playing a very familiar role in his career. A man driven by his crotch. He's good at his role, but he needs to try something new and refreshing. His character loved his job until his favorite boss died, and his son took over the company-the tool. Kevin Spacey plays the role of the psycho-Dave Harken. He is great, and highly believable, in this role. He didn't take his character too far over the edge, but went far enough to make him really insane. Jennifer Aniston played the role of Dr. Julia Harris, D.D.S.-the man-eater. This is a surprising change in her usual choice of acting roles. She really changed her acting persona in this film, and it worked amazingly well. Colin Farrell played the role of Bobby Pellitt-the tool. His character doesn't appear too much in the film. His character is taken highly over the top, so that people can't wait to see him die.

I give this film a 5 out of 5 stars! I really enjoyed this film. The acting was amazing, and the cast had great chemistry. The comedic style is more for the average working person, and changes the recent style of comedy that has been present in modern films.

Answer to last question: Actor Stephen Lang played the role of Brigadier General Dean Hopgood in the film The Men Who Stare At Goats.

Que: What television did actors Charlie Day and Jason Sudeikis appear in in?

30 Rock
Arrested Development
It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia
Parks and Recreation

Conan the Barbarian (2011)

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a fan of my facebook page! The Film Code Link

This follows the story of Conan, based of a character (created by Robert E. Howard) that became popular after appearing in pulp fiction magazines Weird Tales. Conan the Cimmerian was born during battle, and his name was given with her last breath. Years later, Conan is a young boy anxious to become a warrior to prove his worth to his father. He gets the opportunity to show his warrior skills, but his father made sure to teach him to fight for a purpose. Shortly after, their village was attacked by Khalar Zym and the leaders who follow him. They work together to murder Conan's father. Conan grows up a thief, and a warrior fighting for what he believed in. More years later, he is an adult fighting to avenge his father's death, and for the freedom of Hyboria against an evil sorcery of Khalar.

This film was directed by Marcus Nispel, who is developing his name in the world of directing. I haven't read the comics, but from what I've heard this film goes back to the roots of the story. This film has several great action sequences that are well choreographed. There is also a realism to the sword fighting making it believable. The magic is kept simple which is good. The magic doesn't over shadow the violence in the least bit. The special effects are good, although sometimes are a bit poorly done. The music played added to the feel of the film very well. The plot of the story was a simple time pieced action film. The ending was fairly predictable. The backdrop was a great choice. There wasn't much build on the characters, and the character interactions. This film centered around the constant fighting sequences. This made it really hard to feel for the other characters in the film. There is some nudity in this film, mostly naked women, and a lot of violence.

The characters are stereotypical of the film genre. They could've been explored more in depth to create a much better film to makes you feel for them. Jason Momoa played the leading role of Conan. He isn't well known to popular audiences just yet. He is good in this role, but not great. He creates a general character who enjoys fighting, loving, and living and will never change. Rachel Nichols played the female lead of Tamara. She is good as the sarcastic priestess who refuses to follow any man. She is hunted because she is the last of the bloodline of Acheron. Which means her blood is needed in a ritual to use an evil magic infused mask. She is fun to watch, but it would've been nice to see more of her character interacting with Conan. Other than sarcasm, fighting, sex, and then back to fighting. Stephen Lang played the villainous Khalar Zym. He made a great villain that you wanted to see dead. Rose McGowan played the role of Marique, Khalar's daughter. She was good at creating this twisted character, but her interactions with her father were highly disturbing. It's one thing to show support, but another to taking it too far over the top. 

I give this film a 2 out of 5 stars! It's a great action film, but the story fails to deliver. The characters are cheesy, and the ending is predictable. The best thing is that it remains moderately true to its original material.

Answer to last blog: The nickname to Bella's baby is Nessie (Twilight Saga).

Que: What character did actor Stephen Lang perform as in the film The Men Who Stare At Goats?

Lyn Cassady
Brigadier General Dean Hopgood
Todd Nixon
Bill Django

Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Pt. 1

 Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a fan of my facebook page! The Film Code Page

This film is the final chapter in the film franchise of Twilight, based on the novel (of the same title) by Stephenie Meyer. It follows Belle Swan as she is about to become Bella Cullen. She begins facing her fears of marriage and dying. After her and Edward Cullen say I do they go on a romantic honeymoon to Isla Esme. Bella enjoys her last moments as a human, but soon discovers that she is pregnant by her vampire lover. She makes the dangerous choice of keeping the child with the help of Rosalie Cullen. This is against everyone else's better judgments. This also places Bella as an enemy to the werewolves from the Quileute Native American Tribe in Forks, Washington. Although, Jacob Black belongs the wolf pack he is forced to make the decision between his heart (Bella), and his loyalty to the pack.

Okay, this is definitely not my favorite of the novel series, and it remains not a favorite of the films either. This film was directed by Bill Condon, and was supervised by Stephenie Meyer. This is a challenging review because it is only part one taken from a single novel. This part mainly follows Bella through the pregnancy of her baby, and already we can see how having a dhampir (real word for it) baby is potentially deadly. It is also a great connivence that Edward could hear the baby talk while it was still in the womb. This is not a PG-13 film. There is blood, a mentally graphic birth scene, and plenty of sex.  The film ratings system lied on this one-sorry. The material is very adult. This film also carried a mixture of themes; death, vampirism, and love. Since it carried so many themes it had a lot to contend with visually. Visually it was great watching the film begin highly vibrant, full of life, and then turn dark, lifeless. From the wedding, to the island, and then back to Forks. The effects for Bella's transformation was amazing. I loved the new take on the vampire transformation process. It really made it feel more like a virus that would course its way through the body. Watching Bella's body change through the film was amazing. You could see the damage the baby was causing her body by denying her any nutrition. Then to watch her body as the virus was changing her was great. You got to watch her body mend itself from her sickly decayed body. It really pulled audiences into this tragic part of the story. It was unfortunate that they used the same Avatar ending film technique for this film. Where it focus' on her eyes as they open to changed eyes and end. The romantic sequences of the film were challenging to apply because of the constant dark undertone of the film. They responded by going slightly over the top with the romance sequences. The visualization of when Jacob imprints (not telling who for those who haven't read the novels, or seen the fim) was over the top at first. But it gets better because of what it hints at. The werwolves were always great to watch digitally. In this film there is a better glimpse of their world. Viewing the chaos in his mind after he learns about Bella's pregnancy was great. The voices all sounding in his head made the world sound chaotic. The only bad part of the voices was the echo-it didn't need to be there. The romance between Bella and Edward was passion filled during some of the sequences was great. Although during the wedding kiss it felt dirty to be watching it. The actual sex scene, much like the baby birth scene, was well done. It hinted at a lot that wasn't shown. The baby was good until you saw it after the birth in Rosalie's arms. In the novel the baby grows fast, and it is portrayed in the film. The also had to digitally add in a computer animated face to the baby which meant large eyes and a bizarre smile. It was just too much. Although, it was funny to listen to the cast make fun of the baby names that Bella came up with. Generally the end credits are great, but in this one the ending instantly hit you with a spaz attack. It reminded me of the bad B movies credits from the 70's. I greatly enjoyed the after the credits scene with the Volturi. It really opened the film for part 2, and made them appear very sinister. For those who like the classic vampires then they would love the Volturi-trust me. They are bad-ass (;D).


The book plot was weak, so the film's story was weak. Its the unfortunate truth, and in some ways it feels like this film was trying to amend those weaknesses. There were some parts of the story that were changed to better fit the film's need for action and time. So, it isn't the most true version of the film series, but it does keep to its original source. The beginning of the story is full of humour which helps in balancing it out. However, I did enjoy how the music added to the film's story. During the wedding scene they used Flightless Bird from the first Twilight film. It added so much more history to the story. The remaining music was mainly instrumental which gave it a classy feel.

The acting was great, except for Kristen Stewart. It was unfortunate that sometimes the editing of the film almost took away from the acting. Kristen Stewart returned to her leading role of Bella Swan/Cullen. Her acting has become much better in this film, but there were still those awkward moments. It appeared as if she was having trouble letting go of what was happening in real life to continue portraying this character. She was able to pull through it and give the love scene's real emotion. Robert Pattinson returned to his role of Edward Cullen. In this film he really becomes a secondary character. For several parts of the film he remains in the back watching over Bella in shocked, and mournful, silence. He is still great. He makes the pain, and regret, in his face very visible. His acting is still very subtle, but good. For the first time we are also shown a darkness that existed within Edward once. It gives his character a different appearance (still heroic though). Taylor Lautner, Jacob Black, really pulled it out of the bag in this film. His acting has matured to portray a real deep emotion. His dark emotions are present in this film. There are moments where you can just see the pain and the anger. During, and after, the birthing scene it was amazing to watch all his confused emotions following through his body as everything was happening all at once. Julia Jones, Leah-werewolf, was great in this role. She really pulled out her character from remaining in the background to a deeply sympathetic character. The film also explored her character more than the novels had done, which was great. Chaske Spencer, Sam Uley, was also good in this film. He really brought out the alpha male in his character, and the choices standing before him. Ashley Greene (Alice Cullen), Peter Facinelli (Dr. Carlisle Cullen), Elizabeth Reaser (Esme Cullen), Kellan Lutz (Emmett Cullen), Nikki Reed (Rosalie Cullen), and Jackson Rathbone (Jasper Cullen) were all great. They didn't stand out in this film as they have in the others. They just played the characters forced into a strange, and chaotic, situation.

I give this film a... 3 out of 10 stars! There as a lot working against this film, and it worked through them as best it could. It had several great computer generated moments (one bad one). The story is good. The acting was mostly great to watch.

Answer to last blog: Voice actor Steve Whitmire assisted in voicing the character Kira (A Gelfling) in the 1982 film The Dark Crystal.

Que: What is the nickname of Bella's baby?

Esma
Renee
Esme
Nessie

The Muppets

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my reviews, please join my facebook page! The Film Code Page

This film follows the story of two brothers, Walter and Gary. They grew up on the old 1970's The Muppets Show. Walter used it as an escape from the outside world, and dreamed of eventually becoming one. Years later, Gary is about to Mary out on a vacation to Hollywood to celebrate their anniversary. Walter tags along, so that he can live a dream of touring the Muppet Studio's. While on the tour Walter make a dark discovery-Tex Richman plans to buy the Muppet Studio's and tells the Muppets that he's going to turn into a museum, but in realty wants to turn into another oil company. Walter sets out on an adventure to get the former Muppets back together in order to save the studios.

This film was inspired by the classic show created by Jim Henson, and was directed by James Bobin. This is a tough film to review, because there is two viewpoints behind this film. There is the classic viewpoint of those people who have grown up with the Muppets their entire lives, and loved the classic show. While there are others that have not seen the show, or the films, and are new to them. This film gets the best reviews of the Muppets films because it combines the classic-ness of the television show while being reminiscent of the Muppets previous films. It is also different in that keeps Henson's tradition of using puppets instead of computer animation that many older audience's are tired of. In several ways the film became a satire of its own self, and of the previous films of its genre. I did get annoyed when I heard Walter's talent for the first time. Only because I have sensitive ears, and it hurt. Otherwise it was unique to the film. I enjoyed seeing the muppet/human differences during one of the song segments with Walter, Peter Linz, and Gary, Jason Segel. This film also introduced villainous Muppets, the Moppets, that are likely to return in a different sequel (*maniacal laugh).  I also enjoyed the introduction of 80's robot as a full fledged character. It was humorous joke on the past (even a joke on the old landline internet connection). The songs were random, and cheesy. The story is heartfelt, but predictable. The ending did begin to surprise me, but then it had to correct itself during the beginning of the credits. It was also amazing how the amount of Muppets, through out the film, continued to grow without a full explanation.

The characters were used in a satirical way; meaning they were crazy cheesy, but they kept the classic feel of the Muppets. Naturally, this is made to focus on the Muppets and not the people aiding them. Walter, voiced by Peter Linz, was adorable. He is essentially the innocent dreamer. He was a great choice for carrying the story, and made a great new Muppet. Jason Segel played the role of Gary. He Walter's brother and Mary's boyfriend; that's about the most of his character. Through the film he does learn something about himself, but his character is kept in limited use. He is good in his innocent role. Mary, Amy Adams, is no stranger to Disney productions. She plays a familiar innocent love struck role that most audience's are familiar with. Her character isn't explored past being Gary's girlfriend. Steve Whitmire did the voice for Kermit the Frog. He is a voice from the past keeping Kermit's persona intact. He really gives him the hero personality that audience's love. Eric Jacbson voiced the role of Miss Piggy and Fozzie Bear. He kept true to their familiar lovable persona's. Dave Goelz voiced Gonzo. The Muppets were kept true and full of heart. Several new younger audience's will enjoy watching them.

I have to start this segment with an explanation. I'm changing the rating systems from 10 to 5 stars. It'll be just easier for me to do.

Without further ado, I give this film a 3 out of 5 stars! It has a good satirical story, but at the same time I think this film was made mainly for the older generations that grew up with the Muppets. I was also hoping for something more from the songs. I doubt that their are too many of the younger generation that are sharing the same feelings for the Muppets that the older audiences feel (this is more a change of the times than anything else).

Answer to last blog: Director Stanley Kubric first choose actors Robin Williams and Robert Di Nero for the role of Jack Torrance in the Shining. (Author Stephen King choose actors Jon Voight and Michael Moriarty.)

Que: What character did voice actor Steve Whitmire assist in voicing in the Jim Henson film The Dark Crystal in 1982?

Kira (A Gelfling)
Fizzgig (A Friendly Monster)
Jen (A Gelfling)
Aughra (A Keeper of Secrets)

The Shining

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Check out the facebook page, and become a member @http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Film-Code/288673614500374 !


This film, inspired by the 1977 Stephen King novel of the same same, follows the story of the Torrance family; Jack, Winifred (Wendy), and Danny. To get a chance to clear his head, and write a better novel, Jack Torrance agrees to become the caretaker of the Overlook Hotel during its off winter season. However, the hotel is full of unnerving secrets that quickly begin to affect the family in dangerous ways. 


"Redrum, redrum, rerum!" Okay, this film was directed by Stanley Kubrick. Now, not having read the novel I can't fully say how loyal it is, or isn't to the film. I also never got a chance to see the the remake of the Shining tv mini-series in 1997 (which was watched over by Stephen King). As following only this film it obviously left an impression on several audiences. It brought some new techniques to add an additional creepiness to the film's sequences. In the story there is a lot of underlining notes that adds to the deviousness of the film. There was a lot of limitations with the special effects. Instead of computer animation it used general make-up on the spirits, and camera angels. It is nice to see a horror film, every once in a while, do great without the use of commercials. Several audiences have created their own interpretations of the film, especially its ending. The simplest answer is the best, Jack Torrance was reincarnated from a former guest. The story is simple, but it builds as the film progress'. Jack accepts his role as caretaker, and the entire family comes with him. There is an instant feeling of fear, as there is an introduction of Danny's mental abilities, and a haunting in one of the rooms. Jack Torracne slips deeper into insanity, and this forces Wendy Torracne to find some way to survie. It is great in its simplicity. 


The acting was good. Jack Nicholson played the leading role of Jack Torrance. He is great in the typical role of a man who goes insane through the film. Shelley Duvall played Nicholson's opposing role, Wendy Torrance. She is great in the role of the heroine. She doesn't stand out in her acting other being the actress opposite Nicholson. Ironically Danny Llyod played the of Danny Torrance. He is amazing for his age. He creates the creepy kid caught in the middle of all this chaos. Scatman Crothers, Dick Hollorann, was good in his role. He attempts to save the family, but fails. Joe Turkel, the bartender, was a unique spirit. He tempted Jack with his previous sins to pave the way to his insanity. Philip Stone played the role of Delbert Grady. He was an amazing character that only really appeared once. The interaction between him and Nicholson was amazing to watch. 


I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." This film has several great film traits that have made it a cult classic. 


Answer to last blog: Actress Winona Ryder got her name established in the film Heaters. 


Que: What were the original actors first chosen, by director Kubric, but were later passed over?


Robin Williams & Robert Di Nero
Rober Di Nero & Jon Voight
Jon Voight & Michael Moriarty
Michael Moriarty & Robin Williams

Black Swan

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Check out the facebook page, and become a member @http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Film-Code/288673614500374 !


This film follows the story of a ballet dancer in a New York city ballet company. She is living with her mother and is asked to dance for the leading role in a new version of Swan Lake. Where the leading dancer would dance both roles of the White Swan, and the black Swan. After receiving the, Nina Sayers, finds herself facing her greatest enemy; herself. As she slips further away from reality she finds herself reaching the perfection that she believes a ballet dancer should have.

This psychological thriller was directed by Darren Aronofsky. The earlier commercials were sneaky for this film, presenting it more dramatic, and focused more in Portman's acting performance, until it came close to its official release date. This film fits the unique style of the director who is becoming widely known in Hollywood. I will be honest, if Portman hadn't delivered as good a performance as she did then it would've received the general negative review given to psychological thrillers. The editing of the film was well done, and made several of the scene's appear more chaotic. This film found itself swarmed with controversial after its popular release. There was both a costume and an unpaid intern controversy, but the most popular was the dancing double. The young dancer Sarah Lane did much of dancing sequences in the film, and later had her face replaced by Portman's. It is understandable that this happened, because ballet is one of the hardest dances to learn; and twice as had to perfect. However, it upset several of the films audiences for some unknown reason.  The film's story isn't too unique to the world of psychological thrillers. Exploring someone's self destruction first hand is becoming rather popular. However, the way it was told through a shy girl controlled by her over bearing mother facing the outside world is new. The editing went key in hand with the telling of the story. The ending sequence with Sayers facing her mental demons thus allowing her to best dance the role was brilliantly done.

Natalie Portman played the leading role of Nina Sayers. Her instantly passionate performance made this film into what it is. It made gave all the critics one thing to agree on. She was great in the role-no one can argue it. Mila Kunis played the role of Lily. Barbra Hershey played the role of Erica Sayers, Nina's mother. She is returning to popular audiences. She was great as Portman's opposing force. The two play off each other in a great way. Vincent Cassel played the role of Thomas Leroy. AS the french ballet company leader is great. He forces Nina Sayers to face the side of herself that she kept hidden, because she didn't want to lose control. She played her usual role of a young, impulsive, and verbally open character. She was a new ballerina from San Francisco, and changed Nina Sayers life. In a way she became one of Sayers antagonists. Winona Ryder, Beth Macintyre, was brilliant. She portrayed a different version of what Nina Sayers was becoming, and showed her what to fear.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! It was a great film with amazing performances. The directing and editing of the film really brought out the inner characters turmoil.

Answer to last blog: Jim Carrey also starred in the seasonal film How The Grinch Stole Christmas in 2000.

Que: What teenage oriented film established Winona Ryder to popular film audiences?

Ferris Buller's Day Off
The Breakfast Club
St. Elmo's Fire
Heathers

(Disney's) A Christmas Carol (2009)

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Check out the facebook page, and become a member @http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Film-Code/288673614500374 !


This film is based off the classic novel by Charles Dickens. This story follows the adventure of Ebenezer Scrooge. Seven years ago, Scrooge's business partner, Marley, died. Scrooge hates the spirits of Christmas, and is the greedy accountant who gets richer without sharing his financial wealth. On this seventh year of Christmas Marley's spirit pays Scrooge a visit. Marley explains to him that as a gift he would send three other spirits to visit him, so that Scrooge could avoid Marley's fate. The ghost's of Christmas Past, Christmas Present, and Christmas Yet To Come, pay him a visit on Christmas Night. 


This film was directed by Robert Zemeckis, who has had previous experience with directing animated features. This film faces several challenges. it was made as a seasonal film, so it is truly enjoyed during the Christmas holidays. The script is also written in the classic 1880's language of old London. It is also geared mostly towards a younger audience, and is fairly dark cinematically. However, it does remain true to its original source material (with small differences to better fit modern films). It openly talks about the social injustes that people faced in the 1880s (and still do today), and embraces the Christmas holidays. The visual effects were well done. They weren't mentioned in the story, and could've been overplayed, but it added to the story. It gave a better image of the various spirits, and their effect on Scrooge. 


It also is full of surprisingly good voice acting from Jim Carrey and Gary Oldman. These are the two major actors that appear in the film for the various characters. Jim Carrey did the voices of Scrooge (through all the various ages), Ghost of Christmas Past, Ghost of Christmas Present, and Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come (even though he never actually spoke any words). Gary Oldman did the voices of Marley, Bob Cratchit,and Tiny Tim. The voices added a certain emotion the various characters. Jim Carrey's voices for the ghosts were slightly omniscient, and sometimes creepy. Carrey's voice for scrooge was excellent. He didn't take the character to the extreme in comedic fashion. He kept true to the character's trials. Gary Oldman gave his character's a very sympathetic voice. It gave them heart, and made them sympathetic to audiences. 


I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars! It's a great film, and is great to watch during the seasonal holidays. I really enjoyed this version of Dicken's classic tale. Its only downfalls are that its written in language that modern audiences would have trouble understanding, and that is very dark for a potential children's film.


Answer to last blog:Zachary Levi voiced the character Arcade Israel Gannon in Fallout: New Vegas.


Que: What other holiday did Jim Carrey star in?


A Christmas Story
The Polar Express
How the Grinch Stole Christmas
The Santa Clause

Tangled

Cauion: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Check out the facebook page, and become a member @http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Film-Code/288673614500374 !


This film follows the story of Rapunzel (loosely inspired from the story Rapunzel written in Grimm's Fairy Tales). Rapunzel see's an opportunity to live her dream of seeing the floating lights on her 18th birthday (as the floating lights only appear on that day;her birthday, every year).  Rapunzel asks her mother, Gothel, who refuses to let her leave the tower. With the sudden appearance of Flynn Rider, as he was trying to escape the authorities horse (Maximus) with the royal crown, Rapunzel makes a choice. She makes an agreement with Rider that if he escorts her into the city to see the floating lights she will return the royal crown to him. Rider reluctantly agrees, and the two set out on an a wild adventure. 


This film marked the 50th film to be created by Disney studios, and was directed by Nathan Greno and Byron Howard. The two have worked together on previous projects. This film has a great moving story line that harkens back to the old Disney princess films (Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, and Snow White). It being reminiscent of those films follows the very general premise of such films. The story line was also very loosely based off the Grimm's fairy tale, as appears commonly in other of disney's animated films. It is also filled with the characters singing their emotions. The song are good adding to the story, but there is one cheesy song. The sound was good for the voice actors, expect for a slight echo that occurred slightly too often. The computer generated graphics were amazingly well done. Several of the scene's were breath taking to watch. The film was focused for a general teenage audience. It came off as slightly too teenage, but it was still a great film to watch. 


There are awesome characters that are entertaining to watch. The voice acting is well done. Although, it was surprising how many characters actually spoke in the film. Mandy Moore did the voice for the leading character Rapunzel. She creates a naive character that is willing to venture out to see a new world. She portrays the character as too much like a young teenager. It works for the basic premise of the film. Zachary Levi did the voice acting for Flynn Rider. Levi is great in this role of a thief, and is the main voice for telling the story. He was a great choice for leading the story, because he adds a lot of humour to the story. Donna Murphy voice the character Mother Gothel, or Rapunzel's mother. She was an amazing voice actress for this character. She really gave her that villainy aspect that hasn't been seen since the evil step-mother. I also want to add that the Short Thug, voiced by Paul F. Tompkins, was kind of creepy.


I give this an 9 out of 10 stars! It has a great story that reminds audiences of the old classic Disney princess films. However, it was geared more towards to a teenage audience, and it showed. Visually the film is amazing, and fun to watch. 


Answer to last blog: Joss Whedon produced the shows Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, and Angel, but it was Buffy the Vampire Slayer that established his status. 


Que: What video game did Zachary Levi voice act in?


Gears if War 3
Fallout: New Vegas
Halo 3
Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Thor

Caution: This Mght Contain Spoilers!

Check out the facebook page, and become a member @ http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Film-Code/288673614500374 !

This film is based of the comic Marvel comic series with the same name by Stan Lee. Thor is an arrogantly naive warrior who is next in line to become king of Asgard. On the day of his crowning, the frost giants attack the room filled with highly dangerous weapons. Thor takes it as an attack that should be avenged, but his father, Odin, does not wish to seek war. With convincing from his brother, Loki, they, and Thor's companion warriors, attack the frost giants home. Loki begins to learn a secret of his past while the frost giant's leader decide this was an act of war. Thor, for going against King Odin's wishes, is banished to another planet-Earth. Thor meets the scientist Jane Foster who aids him as he begins to learn his father's lessons. He also assists Jane against the S.H.E.I.L.D. forces that are trying to figure out what is happening around them. 

Yes, S.H.E.I.L.D. has to be included in the information because it was apparent that this film was meant to be a lead in to the Avenger's film. The emphasis on them was overdone, and didn't need to be in the film as extensively as it was.  It took away from the deep story that was presented in this film. Anyway, this film was directed by Kenneth Branagh with assistance from Joss Whedon. I haven't read the comics, so I can't say how loyal the film is to those said comics. I do know that their is a nod to Thor's original comic custom, and there is a Stan Lee cameo appearance. Finding Lee tells you which comics are is his favorite, and is a great feature for fans to look for (even if its like finding Waldo). This film is also made for selective audience's who like science fiction, who like comic-based films, or who like films based off mythology. This film falls heavily on the Norse mythologies of Thor, Odin, and Loki, and changes it to into a science fiction style of film. The story is very deep, and could've made it an awesome film. However, it was explored as detailed as it could've been. A lot of the major story points appear too fast, and are over shadowed by other elements. There isn't a ton of combat in this film. Instead the film turns to telling the story of Thor and how he became involved with S.H.E.I.L.D. The humour added made it slightly too comical, but at the same it was good for the film. What combat the film had was good. It added to the story, and the effects used for the fights were well done. The Destroyer that Loki unleashes was amazingly well done graphically. Asgard was visually striking. It was easy to see it as another world that existed without Earth. It was so visually different from Earth that helped to create Thor's universe. Having the other parts of the film shot in a desert like area (meant to be New Mexico) kind of gave a nod to the idea of aliens invading Roswell. The ending clip was really a mind boggler until another Marvel film was released that same summer. 

The actors were great, and had so much subtleties in their acting. The only default is that many of the characters were given a child like naivety. Chris Hemsworth plays the leading role of Thor. He is an actor really getting an amazing standing in popular Hollywood. His portrayal of Thor was unique, and fun to watch because of the depth of emotion he faces. He begins as naive and arrogant, but then learns to think before he acts. This change is present in his acting, and is very subtle. Natalie Portman plays the female leading role of Jane Foster. She is naturally an amazing actress as can be seen from her previos film roles. In this film she is the comical humour, and she is also the child-like damsel scientist. She is good in this role, but it was done with a little too much child-like behavior. Anthony Hopkins plays the role of Odin. When I first heard about this, I was taken completely aback by him being in this role. I was also surprised when I saw him in the film. He pulled out the wise father surprisingly well. Tom Hiddleston played the role of Loki. He is an amazing contrast to Thor. Much of his acting is very subtle. At first he appears villainy, but then his character turns out to have more child-like naivety than Thor. 


Stellan Skarsgard, Erik Selvig, is entertaining to watch. In many ways he's the fatherly figure to Jane Foster. He is good, but his role could've ben explored more. Kate Dennings, Darcy Lewis, is the typical teenage research assistant. She has some sarcastic humour, but her role also wasn't explored beyond being an assistant. Clark Gregg, Agent Coulson, has a role that also appeared in Iron Man. He's highly fairly humorous in this film, but only as a man who is caught in over his head. He's good at his small role. Jaimie Alexander (Sif-a childhood friend), Ray Stevenson (Volstagg-Warrior's Three), Tadanobu Asano (Hogun-Warrior's Three), and Josh Dallas (Fandral-Warrior's Three) were brought in as Thor's most trusted companions. They are moderately new actors establishing their careers. Theirs roles were kept brief, and were portrayed with way too much childish behavior. They seemed like a group of children looking to cause innocent trouble. 


I give this film a 8 out of 10 stars! It has such great potential, but their was too much holding it back. A little less S.H.E.I.L.D., and more building on the individual character's would've been much better. I understand that Marvel is anxious for the new Avenger's film, but there needs to be a limit. 


Answer to last blog: Orlando Bloom starred in the period film Kingdom of Heaven. 


Que: What television show began Joss Whedon's popularity as a producer?


Angel
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Firefly
Supernatural


P.S. All this publicity for the Avenger's makes me wonder if the film will be really awesome, or really bad. We'll see. 

Troy

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now! ---->>


This film follows the epic tale that surrounds the young romance between Helen and Paris. This film was based off the ancient stories of The Illiad by Homer. King Agamemnon has taken control of all of Greece's cities by using his greatest warrior Achilles. Achilles has never lost a battle, but he does claim Agamemnon as his true king. Instead, he fights to have his name remembered in glory. Two kings; Menelaus of Sparta and King Priam of Troy. King Priam sent his two sons Paris and Hector make the negotiations on his behalf, but Paris foolishly falls in love with Menelaus' wife Helen. Helen sneaks away to be with Paris in Troy. Naturally, King Menelaus seeks revenge on the couple, and brings the help of King Agamemnon and his greatest warrior, Achilles. Achilles agrees so that his name will never be forgotten. However, as soon as the soldiers land on the shores of Troy the war gets out of hand, and the twisted vision of Agamemnon's greed takes control. 


This film was directed by Wolfgang Peterson who is no amateur at directing action films. This film does kind of just throw you into the heat of things. Since most of this story is told through combat, there isn't enough time taken to give a full back story of the characters. Since the story is told through combat there is a lot to be taken in the first time viewing it. The story being told through combat is a unique way to tell an epic story for one of the most expensively made films of its generation. The combat explains the characters in a unique way which works for the film. Much of the story is taken away from the classic Greek cliche of Gods/Goddesses and instead turns to telling the story of the hero's and the kings involved. It also toys with the idea of hero's versus kings and their purposes for combat. At the same time it plays off the hazards of love. I haven't read the Illiad, so I can not say how truthful it was. But I have heard arguments that it wasn't very truthful to the story. The action scene's were great to watch. They pulled out the characterization in a very general way, but gave the film its masculine quality. The armies were computer generated, but for its time period wasn't badly done. 


The characters were cliched in being the typical action stars with their quirks. The only way this film is a chick flick is that you see Brad Pitt naked for much of the film (*wink*). Brad Pitt plays the role of Achilles. He carries much of the film, and is kind of the leading character. He is experienced in battle, but has grown to resent it, and later learns how peaceful love is. Once you stop staring at his rock hard stomach you can see his amazing acting. He really brings out the character's pain and impulses.  Eric Bana played the opposing role of Hector for this film. He was a great opposing actor for Pitt. His character kept a cool demeanor through the film, but did express fear and loss through his subtleties. Orlando Bloom, famous for acting in period pieces, played the role of Paris. He portrayed Paris as a highly naive youth who made thousands of mistakes. He was a surprisingly great actor for this role-which has since changed in modern films. Diane Kruger, Helen, was good but didn't really stand out in her role. She was the pretty face that got Troy into turmoil. Rose Byrne, Briseis, was good in her role. As a female character she over shinned Helen with her acting and character. She still doesn't stand out among the male actors as much. Brian Cox played the villainous role of Agamemnon. He was great at making audience's despise his character. 


I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars! It's great to watch for the nudity and action sequences. But the story just goes too fast, and there isn't appropriate emphasis on love that causes the characters suffering. It's turned into a side note instead. The effects were great for this film.

Answer to last blog: Actor Walter Matthau was the leading male actor the the 1969 film Cactus Flower.

Que: What other time period film has Orlando Bloom Starred in?

Gladiator
Beowulf
300
Kingdom of Heaven

Finished watching Troy. A review to come soon.

Power outage on 4th...

Just Go With It

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now! --->>


This film is a loose adaptation from the 1969 film Cactus Flower (which was based off a Broadway play by Abe Burrows) follows the love story of Danny Maccabee. Danny had once nearly gotten married in Staten Island in 1988. However, hearing his soon to be wife's comments he flee's to a local bar. Holding onto the golden ring a woman flirts with him. He creates a lie of abuse, and ends up in bed with the hottest girl in the bar. This leads him to a life of one night stands with various women who have been told lies about an non-existant wife. Danny meets Palmer, and without using any lies ends up in a relationship. She discovers his hidden ring, and this forces him to fabricate a lie of a nonexistent wife. He convinces his plastic surgeon assistant Katerine to pose as his fictitious wife. The lie expands to include her children, and all expense's paid Hawaiian vacation. However, the deeper the lie gets the more Danny begins to question his heart. 


This film was directed by Dennis Dugan who has had experience working with Adam Sandler, and plenty of experience directing comedy films. This film plays off the idea of how a wedding ring can change a perspective on someone. It also plays with the idea of a love that takes time to mature, and comes to fruition with a little outside influence. I have not seen the film Cactus Flower, so I can't how true it is to the original. From what I've read the dramatic aspects were removed to make this film a straight up romantic comedy.  Children were also added to create a different experience. Using Hawaii as a backdrop was great, it's starting to be overplayed for these types of films but its still good. The humour is actually intelligent. Adam Sandler has matured from his earlier roles. The story line is kind of predictable though. There are moments when one of the characters goes over the top. There is an unexpected twist that probably didn't need to be added, but it managed to work out in the story. 


Adam Sandler plays the leading role of Danny Maccabee. He's great in this film even though its essentially the same character. Sarcastic Jewish guy who is always made fun of. If you like his acting persona then you'll would enjoy this character. It's a shame that's he's most known for this character, because is good at being a character actor. Jennifer Aniston plays Sandler's counterpart in the role of Katerine. She has come a long way since the television show Friends. Sadly, she too has developed a certain persona that has gotten stuck with her career. The best friend who cares about everyone. She has done other great roles when given the chance. However, most audience's enjoy her popular persona and want to see her continue being that type of character. Although, it was nice to watch her hold her own against a model. Brooklyn Decker plays the young role of Palmer. She is often over the top with her acting as a girl whose too young for Danny. She also has a moment where she gets show off her famous bikini body. Bailee Madison, Maggie, and Griffin Gluck, Michael, are the two children in this film. They very humorous to watch. Their roles really aren't explored far enough other than as Katerine's children. Nick Swardson, Eddie, is definitely an over the top character. Sometimes he can be a bit too much, but that's what his role was intended to be. 


I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars! It's a great romantic comedy film with intelligent humour. It is believable in its predictable story line.  Some of the characters are too over the top, but it is nice to see Adam Sandler maturing. However, neither Sandler nor Aniston bring anything new to their acting persona's, and some of the characters are too over the top. 


Answer to last blog: Director Salim Akil directed the films Soul Food, and Jumping The Broom. 


Que: Who was the original actor in the 1969 film Cactus Flower?


Walter Matthau
Robert Redford
Dennis Hopper
Jerry Lewis

Jumping the Broom

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower! --->>


This story follows Sabrina Watson, a woman who tends to sleep with men before she learns they're personalities. She makes a vow to God to only sleep with her husband once she meets the right man. She finds the hopeful mr. right in Jason Taylor. Five months into their relationship he propose's. They agree to marry without really having met the other's family. When the two families meet, Watson's family being from uptown and Taylor's family being from downtown, all family secrets become revealed. 


This film was directed by Salim Akil who is beginning to get his directing and writing career off the ground. This film falls heavily around African American traditions revolving around a wedding, and it also explores different family values. This being the film's focus means that this film was made for a special audience. It does really present a unique family story-line that is true to most families. The story really plays to the difference's of the rich versus the poor. The storyline ended with an expected happy ending. This film is just a romantic film, and doesn't have much in the way of comedy. The light humour does help keep the film from being a dramatic film. Using Martha's Vineyard has a background for the story was brilliant. It gave the film a picturesque feel. 


The acting is this film was very believable. It really brought out the realistic aspects of the characters. Paula Patton played the leading role of Sabrina Watson. She is starting a promising career in which she is proving that she can play very different roles and characters. She created a heartwarming naive character that audience's could easily relate to, and cheer for. Laz Alonso played the role of Jason Taylor. He's another actor beginning a promising career. He creates a typical male character facing an early marriage and is worried about losing his manhood. His character might rub some female audience's the wrong way, but will be quickly overlooked. Deep down the character is goodhearted. Loretta Devine plays the role of Mrs. Taylor. Her on screen presence can not be ignored. She plays the role of mother who doesn't want to lose her son, and will find anyway to keep. In the end her character grows from the events that happen from her choices. She does an amazing job portraying this character with feeling. Angela Bassett takes on the role of Mrs. Watson. She creates a character who attempts to maintain control of everyone around in hopes of protecting them. Her character also grows through the experiences she faces. She is great in this film creating a strong female character. 


I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars. It is good and has a heartfelt story, but it really plays to specific audience. The story is unique with it's characters. It was wrongly presented as a romantic comedy, and should've just been a romantic film. 


Answer to last blog: Maria Olsen plays the role of the Creepy Woman in the film Paranormal Activity 3.

Que: What other popular film has director Salim Akil directed?

Precious
Soul Food
Akeelah and the Bee
For Colored Girls

Paranormal Activity

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now!


This is the third sequel to the infamous film Paranormal Activity. This story is set in 1988, years before the first series of tapes were discovered. These tapes follow the childhood story of Katie and her sister Kristi Rey. Julie is living with her boyfriend Dennis, and their two daughters in a new house. Dennis and Julie agree to attempt to make a sex tape. There is an earthquake and dust appears to fall upon an human image. Strange noises continue to happen, so he decides to set-up video camera's in their bedroom and in their daughters bedroom. It becomes apparent that Kristi's friend Tobe has sinister motives against the family, and their friends. 


This film begins during the sequel of the trilogy. After the tapes disappear then it goes into the past. This film was directed by Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman. This film uses the same handheld camera techniques to tell a story that the other films had done. The first film had a single handheld camera, the second used security camera's, but this one used two handheld camera's and a rotating camera. The rotating camera was brilliantly set-up to capture the living room and the kitchen. This film has plenty of jump moments, but it's mainly plays to audience's built-up tension. Unfortunately this one uses more Hollywood techniques,  and it is obvious that it had a higher budget. A few times I was reminded of The Poltergeist. This film had an actual script whereas the first was entirely improvisational script. The editing of the film was too clean cut. There are moments when scene's got cut too early and ruined the eerie atmosphere. Whatever was in the first film did not carry onto this one. The ending was too random. There was much that was left unexplained, and it all happened all at once. 


Chloe Csengery played the role of young Katie. She does great in presenting a terrifying ghost, and being caught in the center of the attack. Jessica Tyler Brown plays the role of young Kristi Rey. She is very creepy in this role. She also really creates the tension of the film. Lauren Bittner plays the role of Julia. She tries to be the sensible realist who doesn't believe in the paranormal. She is good in this film. She isn't haunted until the end of the film. She is believable as the neurotic mother. Christopher Nicholas Smith plays the role of Dennis. He is the light hearted boyfriend who is trying to figure out what all is happening. He is great to watch, and someone audience's can easily relate to. 


I give this film a 8 out of 10 stars! This film was good and full of jump moments. But it was too clean cut and hurt the realistic imagery it was aiming for. 


Answer to last blog: Director Chris Miller (Puss In Boots) voice the role of The Magic Mirror in the Shrek film series. 


Que: Who plays the role of the Creepy Woman in this film-Paranormal Activity 3?


Maria Olsen
Isabelle Fuhrman
Takako Fuji
Lorna Raver

Puss In Boots

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now!


This film spin-off from the Shrek film series, follows the story of Puss in Boots. Puss finds himself on the wrong side of law in his hometown. During the festival of the fire... and of the chicken he finds an opportunity to not only redeem himself but to explore his past dream. Finding the magic beans that will grow the beanstalk that'll lead to the giants castle where a magical goose lays golden eggs. He immediately sets out to steal the magic beans from Jack and Jill. His robbery gets interrupted by another cat who turns out to Miss Kitty Softpaws who is working for Puss' past best friend, Humpty Dumpty. After some convincing they agree to set out on an adventure to steal the magic beans and find the magical goose.

This film happened before the Shrek series (before he met Shrek and Donkey), and presents the back story of the popular character Puss.  This film was directed by Chris Miller who has some previous experience with directing an animated film, and has acted in others. This film is straight up adorable! Seeing Puss as a kitten was so adorable... it was unbelievable. One thing I enjoyed about this film is that it kept true to the feline movements and features. Some movements were exaggerated, but overall it toyed with the everyday movements cats do. That being said, this is the perfect film for cat owners. This film is highly different from the Shrek series. Shrek was a romantic fairytale story, and this film is an epic fairytale story. This film being a spin-off from Shrek maintains the basic idea of several fairytale stories being combined into one story. It is also secretly full of adult humour. The CGI (computer generated imagery) graphics is well done. It pushes the basic limits of CGI technology. The fur on the cats looks fairly realistic, especially in close up shots. The story is adorable, but it is also a very simple storyline. It's kind of common in some ways to other children's films. The ending sort of felt like they forced a surprise twist.

Antonio Banderas returned to his ever popular role of Puss. He is great in this voice acting role. He brings a kind of heart to an outlaw character. At the same time there were several times when it felt like Zorro has returned and he has fur. Salma Hayek performs the voice for Kitty Softpaws. She creates a really sympathetic female cat that can counter Puss. She is fun to watch in this film. Zach Galifanakis voices Humpty Dumpty. His character is highly different from his previous roles. He does go slightly over the top, but he isn't as annoying. Billy Bob Thornton voices the villain Jack. He brings a somewhat familiar accent from Sling Blade. Amy Sedaris voices the villain Jill. She makes a fully convincible villain that is intimidating. Together they make a great pair of slimy villains.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! *paw over mouth* "Ohhh." It is a great film for both children and adults. The CGI was well done, and the story is adorable. It is a film for cat people, and isn't the same as the Shrek series that most audience's are accustomed to.

Answer to last blog: William H. Macy became infamous for his role (Jerry Lundegaard) in Fargo.

Que: What role did director Chris Miller play in the Shrek series?

Gingerbread Man
Blind Mouse
The Magic Mirror
Pinocchio

Jurassic Park III

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now!


Dr. Alan Grant is once again facing loss of currency to fund his paleontology research, as his research assistant Billy Brennan. A couple approach's Dr. Grant, Amanda Kirby and Paul Kirby, with a proposition to do something once in a lifetime. Flying over the Isla Sorna to see the dinosaurs. Dr. Grant agrees with the promise of a large amount of money to fund his research. He goes on the trip, facing his past fears, accompanied with some of the Kirby's friends. After the plane lands it becomes apparent that the Kirby's have alternate motives, and that Isla Sorna isn't going to let them live without a fight.


Okay, this film is missing two familiar elements that were in the other two films; Steven Spielberg and Michael Crichton's novel. So, naturally this film has a different tone and different effects (including a new logo). This film was directed by Joe Johnston with some assistant from Steven Spielberg. Michael Crichton wrote the screenplay, but didn't write a novel for this film. Much paler colors were used for this film. The dinosaurs looked visually different from the other films. The new style kind of plays off other lizard animal traits. There is also nearly no human dinosaur contact in this film. It helps with the special effects. They do have a new dinosaur-a Spinosaurus. There is an awesome battle between it and the T-Rex. The Spinosaurus is a bad-ass, but something about just seemed too over the top. The story also focuses more on  characterization rather than the dinosaurs. The dinosaur's are kind of a side note which is different from the other films. It's a good story line, but turning attention away from the dinosaurs makes them less frightening in some way. The vocalization of the velociraptor's was terrifyingly well done.

Sam Neil returns to his role of Dr. Alan Grant. He explores the character more in depth in this film. His character is really molded, and this really shows his acting. Alessandro Nivola plays the role of Billy Brennan. He creates a character who does things on a whim of good intentions. He plays the counter to Dr. Grant, and does great. William H. Macy plays the role of Paul Kirby. This character is similar to some of his other roles in that he keeps the same acting style. It works for this character. Tea Leoni plays the role of Amanda Kirby, and proves that she can hold her own among the men. She is also the horror screaming female character. She brings a heart to her acting in this film. Trevor Morgan, Erik Kirby, is the child actor in this film. There has always been a child, or two, in all of the other films. His character is different in that he is resourceful, and clever. He manages to survive alone against unfathomable odds. He had talent as a child actor that carried on into a small acting career. Bruce A. Young,  M.B. Nash, is a the humorous character brought in for protection. His role is small, but he really turned it into a memorable character.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! It has a great story, and good special effects with the dinosaurs. The Spinosaurus was too much, but was bad-ass on screen.

Answer to last blog: Director Paul Feig directed the films Bridesmaids, and Knocked Up.

Que: What film made William H. Macy infamous?

No Country For Old Men
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Fargo
Face/Off

About to watch Paranormal Activity. A review to come.

About to watch Puss In Boots. Film review to come.

Bridesmaids

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog, please become a follower now! --->>

This film follows the story of Annie who becomes the maid of honor to her best friend Lillian. She is facing a midl life crises as her life has crumbled under her, and is now facing the stress of trying to outdo Helena (another of Lillian's bridesmaids). After two failed attempts, and another failed relationship, she must face her own selfishness. 


Okay, this film wasn't quite as it was advertised. It was promoted as the feminine version of The Hangover or Hallpass. It was made with the raunchy humour unknown to female comedies. This film was directed by Paul Feig. He is a director making his stamp on modern comedy films, and television shows. The story was centered around Annie, and the other bridesmaids, and the bride, are secondary to the story. It has specific style of comedy-raunchy-that most male audience's enjoy. This film mixes the raunchy comedy with problems most women face. The editing of the film was good, and the build-up to the comedic all-hell-breaks-loose scene's were good. Toilette humour was added. To me its unfortunate that almost all comedy films now have to include toilette humour in some way. Something about the film's color, or editing, made it feel slightly uncompleted. Something was missing, but I couldn't figure out what it was. It was also unfortunate that they didn't in anyway show the wild chaos of a bachlorette party.


The acting in this film was good. The characters were highly over the top, but each character represents a different woman in life. This film features two actress' from SNL (Saturday Night Live). Kristen Wiig, Annie, and Maya Rudolph, Lillian. Kristen Wiig is great at creating Annie. Her character can be over the top with the woe is me, but it's the way the character is written and it's what drives the story. Maya Rudolph is good at being the silent best friend who listens to all complaints. Melissa McCarthy is Megan. She breaks all the briars of what femininity has been considered to be. She comes out with the full truth, and sometimes will act as tough as a man. She was highly entertaining, because their was always that question of what she might do next. Rose Byrne plays the role of Helen. Helen is Annie's arch nemesis. She does all in her power to make Annie look bad. Ellie Kemper plays the role of Becca. Becca is the shy and friendly newly wed. Her character's innocence is briefly toyed with, but could've been further explored. Wendi McLendon-Covey, Rita, is playing the character who is wanting an escape from her life with her husband and children. Her knowledge makes her the perfect character to contrast Becca.

I give this movie a 9 out of 10 stars! It's not my general style of comedy I will admit. There seemed to be something missing, and was misinterpreted through commercials. I was expecting more comedic chaos that never came.

Answer to last blog: The leading heroine female actress for the first Hellraiser was Ashely Laurence.

Que: What other comedy film has director Paul Feig directed?

Knocked Up
Super Bad
The Hangover
Get Him To The Greek