Blue Valentine

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers! This also conatins some adult content-discretion is advised!


Please, if you enjoy reading my blog become a follower! ^_^


This film is an independent film written and directed by Derek Cianfrance. The story follows a married couple, Dean (Ryan Gosling) and Cindy (Michelle Williams). Over the years they have come to the realization that has grown dull and meaningless-even with their daughter Frankie (Faith Wladyka). Dean's last attempt to save their marriage crumbles before his very eyes. 


Okay, this film is not a love story. I'm sorry, but to call it a love story means that their actually has to be love. Watching the film I do not believe the characters were ever in love-I think their marriage was sparked by the accident of infatuation. This film is both good and bad. It's very in your face about life and marriage problems.  There is some nudity, but a lot of sex. I enjoyed its straight forwardness  but got some what bored with the plot. It was emotionally gripping, but it has been done a thousand times already. It doesn't present anything new to this type of scenario except for female enjoyment of sex. I give them props for going head to head with the MPAA Ratings systems to achieve an R rating to get more viewers in America. There is no real humour in this film-it's always dark, even its jokes are dark. The music was pretty good for setting the tone for the film. The acting in this film a great-it presents the sincerity in their arguments and decisions. 


I give this film a 7 out of 10 stars! It is a decent story, but it doesn't present anything revolutionary. I do give them props for achieving a better rating than NC-17. (I am glade to see a female character finally enjoying sex-even if its just oral) It's not a love story, so the catch phrase is either a contradiction or wrongly stated. However, if you enjoy straight forward honesty and dark life themes then this is a film you'd enjoy.

Answer to last blog: Mickey Haller's license plate says NTGUILTY in the film The Lincoln Lawyer.

Que: What other independent film is Michelle Williams famous for?

Amores Perros
The Descent
Lost in Translation
Brokeback Mountain

The Lincoln Lawyer

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog please become a follower!


This a film adaptation of the novel from the Mickey Haller series; The Lincoln Lawyer. This story begins with Mickey Haller doing his research from the backseat of his lincoln car. He opens up his character through negations with a biker gang for a future case. He is soon pulled into a new case with a client who was being blamed for attempt to rape and murder. Haller takes the case and begins to dig further into his client's past as the trail progress'. The innocence of a man becomes murky and things quickly become more dangerous for Mickey Haller.


This films opening credit sequence gives the film a brown 70's slick city feeling. This does a great job in establishing a main theme for the film. I haven't read the novel and don't know anyone who has, so I can't say how loyal it is to the novel. I found the actor line-up to be unique for a film. Matthew McConaughey, Laurence Mason (Tin Tin from the Crow), Trace Adkins (a country singer performing the role of Eddie Vogel-the biker), William H. Macy (as Frank Levine), Ryan Phillippe (from I Know What You Did Last Summer and Flags of Our fathers), and John Leguizamo. Oh, and I must mention-Katherine Moenning who played Gloria (one of Haller's other clients). I think this was a great film to open up a future film acting career (hope to see more of her soon). I might be the only one who thought it surprising, but oh well. Anyway, the beginning film sequence for the film sets up McConaughey's character as a shrew lawyer who works for any client against the state for the right price. Sadly, once you know that Haller's the character you hate to love your attention turns to his driver, Earl/Mason. His character is never fully explained and that just makes him more intriguing. I was surprised to see Maggie McPherson (performed by Marisa Tomei) portrayed a different kind of ex-wife. Instead of being bitter she's upset, but understanding. The plot is intriguing, but the story is a mystery told from the perspective of a lawyer. Much of the script is written very argumentative, and the action is mild. If you're expecting hard action then this film isn't for you. The two main villains (for very different reasons) Louis Roulet (Ryan Phillipee) and Mary Windsor (Frances Fisher) could've been portrayed better. There were good moments, and then there were moments where it fell flat.


I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars! The story is intriguing, but in some parts it could've been presented better. The acting was great expect for the villains. It's not a film for children, but a great drama mystery story to watch on the weekend. 


Answer to last blog: It took 22 dogs to create the single character Marley for the film Marley and Me.


Que: What was written on the lawyer's, Mickey Haller's, license plate?


IN-O-CENT
NTGUILTY
$FREEBIRD
URGUILTY

Marley & Me

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog please become a follower! ^_^


This is a film adaptation of the autobiographical novel by John Grogan. This story begins with a marriage, and the purchase of puppy. He was quickly named Marley after the legendary singer Bob Marley, and it doesn't take long to see why he was cheaper than the other puppies. He begins to cause trouble immediately, and couples it with adorable puppy eyes. This story continues following the life of Marley, and his family John and Jennifer Grogan. 


Okay, now if a puppy is on sale there is very likely a reason for it. It's always good to ask first; however, in this case their puppy becomes a great influence on their lives. It combines emotional heartwarming-preserver through life-with humour. My favorite, sides liptting, sequence was watching Marley get kicked out of obedience school. The ending touched my heart. Owen Wilson does a great job portraying John Grogan as a man who is trying to find his place in life, and a man who truly loves his dog. Jennifer Aniston does a great job in the supporting role of Jennifer Grogan-the wife. She shows the challenge's of going from a career to motherhood. The story is mainly about Marley, but has a sub-text of family values and bypassing life's challenge's. (I found it interesting that the author John Grogan stated that he got the most response's he'd ever received for Marley's eulogy.) 


I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! It's a great family film. It does feature some adult material, so it might be better to watch with older children. Anyway, it has a great heart warming story that yanks at your heart. 


Answer to last blog: Director Pierre Morel also directed the film From Paris With Love.


Que: How many dogs worked together to create the single character Marley in this film?


19
22
12
25

Taken

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my blog please become a follower!

This film follows the story of a father who has sacrificed his career as a government agent to reconnect with his daughter. She agrees to a few terms with her father, so that she can go on a trip to Paris, France, with her best friend. It begins as a fun trip but turns into disaster as the two are taken. From a single phone call he sets out on a mission to rescue his daughter from her kidnappers.

Liam Neeson does a great job portraying a desperate father/assassin, Bryan Mills. He also does a great job keeping the fighting simple, and yet really sophisticated. Maggie Grace, who portrays the daughter Kim, does a unique 17 year old girl. She is shown as highly innocent, and looks very young. She reminded me of an 11 year old girl pretending to be a teenager. She does a good job portraying the character, but I think-story wise-they tried too hard to make her innocent. Famke Jassen, portrays the mother, Lenore. She is kind of bitchy, but I think she could've received the news about her daughter a little better. The rest of the story was carried by action which isn't a bad thing. The deeper he goes the more you feel for his plight. The action was well choreographed. Luckily, this film has a happy ending.  It was surprising that after Bryan went to hell to rescue Kim; she still loves her mother more than her father. She even preferred the pop star Sheerah more than him at least that's how it appeared in the ending sequence.

I give this film a 9 out of 10 stars. Its got a lot of great action sequences, but sometimes the story tried too hard to make you sympathetic to the protagonists, and hate the antagonists. This film also is not a film for children.


Answer to last blog: Nicolas Cage, and director Dominic Sena, worked together in the film Gone In Sixty Seconds.

Que: What other popular film has director Pierre Morel directed?

Knight and Day
From Paris With Love
District 9
The A-Team

Season of the Witch

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Please, if you enjoy reading my reviews please become a follower!


This film follows an epic journey. Two friends, Behmen and Felson, were fighting in the crusades against 'God's' enemies. As the Crusades continue and never seem to end-even with all their victories-a realization begins to fall upon Behmen. It becomes more clear in their final crusade when they were forced to murder children and women. Behmen and Felson leave the Crusades which labels them as deserters. They travel to a new town ravaged by the plague and are discovered. They are offered a chance for redemption by agreeing to deliver a witch for trail to a church full of holy monks. This journey quickly leads to fatal accidents and a fear of what lies ahead.


Okay, Nicolas Cage fans will rejoice because this is a good film. I enjoyed it because of its uniqueness in story. This film presents multiple views on the girl's guilt, or innocence, of witchcraft. Claire Foy does a great job with the character, The Girl/Anna. She does a great job presenting the demon in a creepy and unnerving way. She also does a great job in making you question if she is or isn't evil. I enjoyed her subtle changes in her interactions with the various characters. Ron Perlman pretty much plays his usual character, but he adds some heart into this character, Behmen. Nicolas Cage also does a great job in presenting this character. They oddly work well together in this film. they present two opposites that balance each other out. The special effects were good, they added to the story. I enjoyed the subtle effects with the wolves-it was well done. The first sequence opens up with an idea of something being their, and did not explain anything pertinent that isn't explained later. The film would've been better off without it. The opening battle sequence presented the character's fighting style and their persona's. It also explains their world in a unique way. The ending had a lot of potential  but the demon just made it cheesy. (The alternate ending sequence without the demon, just the girl/Anna, was much better.) Otherwise the ending was good because you get a glimpse of the girl and what is might come afterwards.


I give this film an 8 out of 10 stars! It's got a great intriguing story to it, and great acting. There is violence, and religious arguments. I really enjoyed this film myself. If your squeamish to disease that shows, or to violence then you might freak out while watching this film.

Answer to last blog: The Dark Fields was the original novel title for the film limitless. (Written by Alan Glynn)


Que: What other film has director Dominic Sena and actor Nicolas Cage previously worked on together?

Swordfish
Gone in Sixty Seconds
Bangkok Dangerous
The Wicker Man

Limitless

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!

Please, if you enjoy reading my blog become a follower!

Okay, I was pleasantly surprised with this film. The film begins with an average male failing at writing and at life. He speaks with an old friend from his past and he offers him a new drug that will open the mind to work at a 100%. He quickly begins to see the world as an endless place of opportunities. He finished his novel and carries on to control the stock market. However, this drug being so useful has not only a dark side, but a client list.

This film had a rather unique combination that I never thought I'd see in a film: drugs and ambition. The film was directed by Neil Burger, and surprisingly written by Leslie Dixon (considering the other films he's written in the past). Bradley Cooper did a great job portraying this character, Eddie Morra, with heart and mild intelligence. This film also used the various characters to show the drugs potential in different persona's. The drug gets changed often to fit the person's desires. A lot of the plot twists come more from unexpected character turns. This film works a lot with camera movement, and some of the special effects are used to enhance those camera movements. There is also the subtly of change from being on and off the drug. Off the drug, Eddie Morra's eyes, and the world around him is very grey. On the drug everything is bright. There is a lot of sex and plenty of action violence in this film. There is some gore, but only in blood (perhaps I've seen too many horror films).

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! I really enjoyed it as a story, and as a film in general. It could be a bit hard to follow when they talk about stocks, but it doesn't hurt the film in any way. This isn't a film for children though.

Answer to last blog: The Thing was featured in Halloween I.

Que: What was the title of the novel, written by Alan Glynn, that the film Limitless is based off?

Dawka Geniuszu
Winterland
Bloodland
The Dark Fields

Halloween III: Season of the Witch

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoy reading my reviews please become a follower!


This is the third installment to the Halloween franchise. I decided to go back and finish my Halloween Marathon, even if it isn't modern. The story for this film is as the plot implies, a sorcerer's plot to destroy the world.

Made in 1982, it premiered without much success. This went against the grain and started what I call the curse of the 3 (which appears to have no ended). As part of the Halloween franchise, it failed because it did not feature Michael Myers at all-however, it did play on the cult that follows Samhain (the god that Myers is the reincarnation of). It does feature the first Halloween film in brief segments during the course of the film. It might've had more success as a stand alone film, but probably not too much more. It featured several small time actors, Tom Atkins and Stacey Nelkin. The main character, Dr. Daniel Challis, turns into a soap opera type of character-the cheesy type who gets all the ladies. The commercial also gets annoying very quickly. Conal Cochran, Dan O'Herlilhy, was a fairly decent villain though. The plot twists were kind of predictable.

I give this film a 5 out 10 stars! It was decent for the year it was made, but as part of the Halloween franchise it fails disastrously.  The effects were kind of cheesy, but then again it was made in 1982.

Answers to last blog:
Garret Hedlund turned the role of Captain American because of his obligations to Tron.
Chris Evans also starred in the Fantastic Four as Johnny Storm.
Bonus: The first comic Marvel created was The Fantastic Four!

Que: Halloween was featured in Halloween III. What film was featured in Halloween I?

Blood River
The Thing
The Fog
They Live

Captain America: The First Avenger

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers! 


Please, if you enjoy reading my blog become a follower! ^_^


In this newly released Marvel film, we are shown the story that is the lead point for most of it's popularized comics. Steve Rogers is a young American who wishes to join the military to aid his fellow Americans in the war against the Nazi's. However, all his physical downfalls keep him from being accepted into the military. Despite all the refusals, he once again tries to join. Doctor Abraham Erskine overhears his heartfelt conversation with his friend, Bucky, and decides to take a chance on Rogers. He offers him a chance to join the military and be the test subject for his super soldier serum. This path quickly leads him down a path of self discovery and adventure. 


Allright, first off I'm not a comic nerd. I haven't read the original comics-I'm only going off this film. However, I have heard from various people that it holds as true to the comic series as it can. Now, this film is unique among the comic films that have been released. Sadly it fell as only one of the stepping stones for the upcoming Avengers film (coming out next summer-hopefully).  This is unfortunate because it is a good film which is going to set up the Avengers film for a large downfall, or a great success. Anyway, the acting choice was surprising. Chris Evans took up the role (making this his second Marvel film-unheard of for Marvel films). I wasn't too surprised to see Tommy Lee Jones in his part. I was surprised to see Hugo Weaving successfully portraying his general style of acting as the villain Red skull/Johann Schmidt. Toby Jones did a great job portraying his character in this film. If you pay attention you can see the vulnerability of the character, Dr. Arnim Zola. (Stan Lee does a small cameo in this film as well, if you can find him.) Red Skull might be frightening to some, but to me he looked kind of rubbery. However, Captain America himself is portrayed as the average joe instead of an all mighty hero. Dominic Cooper's representation of Howard Stark is odd and slightly out of place. If compared to the Iron Man Howard Stark-he is completely different personality wise. I'm uncertain if Howard Stark is in this film for Hollywood purposes. It makes it even more odd in comparison to the Iron Man series because Captain America took place in the 1940's; whereas, he is said to have died young and sometime in recent years.


The musical score worked wonders with this film-giving it a sense of courageous power. Now, this film is not presented as a traditional comic film. It's a film based off a comic character, but it's presented more as a war film. Which holds true to the comics, or so I'm told. I was glad to see the original Captain America costume appear in the film, and then get updated later in the film for battle. There is a lot of humor in this story, but it ends on a dark note. This film hints at gore, but there isn't any out front gore (save for a five second segment). There is a lot of action that adds to the stories plot. I enjoyed the plot in this because the character of Rogers really develops into a hero.  The film's final ending note sort of ruins the theme for the rest of the film. It would have been better to leave it at the plane crash, and leave it at that. (The additional ending segment would've made a great after credit sequence.) I will confess that I was surprised with the ending after credit clip for this film. Iron Man 2 nudged audiences to Thor, and Thor left some audience's baffled (but it was meant to be for Captain America). In this after credit clip it turns more into an commercial for the Avengers film. Which isn't bad because it's a first glimpse.


I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! This is a great story with great characters! The effects were well done. As a stand alone film it stands out from other comic based films. 

Answer to last blog: Steve Kloves wrote nearly all the Harry Potter films except for the fifth installment (Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix).


Okay, I couldn't decide on a single question. So here's three! Good luck!


Que: Who was originally offered the role for Captain American, but declined due to another film commitment?


Garret Hedlund
Shia LeBeouf
Wentworth Miller
Ben Foster


Que: What other Marvel film did the actor Chris Evans, who portrayed Captain America, also star in?


Ghost Rider
The Fantastic Four
Spider Man
Jonah Hex


Bonus Que: What was Stan Lee's first comic with Marvel? 


Captain American
The Hulk
Iron Man
The Fantastic Four

Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Please, if you enjoy reading my blog become a follower of the Film Code!

In this 6th installment to the Harry Potter franchise, Harry faces a dark year at Hogwart's school. It becomes apparent that Dumbledore plans to use Harry for his plans-that he doesn't fully explain to Harry. Dumbledore first takes Harry to recruit Horace Slughorn to become a teacher at Hogwart's once again. Slughorn is the key that Harry must try and figure out to learn of Voldermort's seemingly immortality. Harry also stumbles upon an old advanced potions book that belonged to the Half-Blood Prince, and this book helps to advance him in potions class but also quickly leads him into trouble. It also becomes apparent that someone is out to murder Dumbledore.

This film has moments of humor, but it's quickly shadowed by some dark plot twist. Their aren't as many new cast members to join in this segment, but their is enough to keep it interesting and somewhat fresh. The actor, Jim Broadbent, is brought in to portray Horace Slughorn. He is a popular character actor (Harold Zidler-Moulin Rouge), and he does not fail to disappoint in this film. A lot of the plot was rushed to best fit reel time, so a lot of the small things mentioned in the book aren't mentioned in the film. We learn more about Voldermort's past in this segment. This film makes it a prominent feature where the others film it was mere chance that his past was revealed. Hermione's cat though seems to have vanished in this segment. To me the relationship between Harry and Ginny was random. Harry in previous films has been in love with Cho, and suddenly this year his opinion changes and he's in love with Ron's little sister. The relationship between Ron and Hermione had been built up to in the previous films very subtly. This film also has two major darkly depressing moments that are, for most, tearjerkers. There might've been another sad moment, but it was glimpsed with humor. In this one we also see the most protected of the popularized Voldermort curses that can be frightening to audiences of the series-if your unprepared for it. I thought the ending structure was well done, and it did Dumbledore's character justice. I also enjoyed the use of shadowing and lighting during the ending-it made the film all the more powerful.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! It's a great continuation. It might be a little too dark to be a family film, but it doesn't go too far with violence. It's still safe to view this film with your teenage children.

Answer to last blog: Maine Coon (Mrs. Norris), British Shorthair (Professor McGonagall), and a Persian (Crookshanks)

Que: Who is the well accredited writer to most of the Harry Potter films?

Michael Goldenberg
Steve Kloves
Craig Titley
Caroline Thompson

P.S. Woot! I made through the entire series. Yay! ^_^

Harry Potter & The Order of the Pheonix

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Please, if you enjoy reading my reviews become a follower! ^_^


This is the fifth installment to the Harry Potter franchise. In his installment Harry is living back with his aunt and uncle for the summer. Harry and Dudley receive a visit from a couple of Dementor's. Harry is forced to perform a counter curse that gets him expelled according to the Ministry of Magic. Harry gets reinstated as a student, thanks to Dumbledore, and quickly learns that the Wizarding world has begun falling into chaos. The Ministry refuses to believe that Voldermort has re-arisen, and has begun taking measures to attempt to reassure the wizarding community of their safety. It has even gone to placing a member of the Ministery, Dolores Umbridge, as the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher. All the while Harry must ward off Voldermort from invading his mind.

Now, I honestly don't entirely now how this become the least favorite story in the Harry Potter series. I speculate that Rowling probably had given up interest in the story, and so dropped the bar on this one. It's also full of teenage outbursts of anger and depression. I've also found that this story somehow manages to upset people. I think it's the character Umbridge, performed by Imelda staunton, which to me is the sign of a great actress. I also think that the frustration comes in with the Ministry's tactics in handling the situation-probably because of how true it would be. This film also brings in a new director, David Yates-who finishes the Harry Potter films. On another note, the actress, Evanna Lynch, did an amazing job portraying Lune Lovegood. She captured the insane innocence of the character. I also caught a plot snag-Hermione can not perform a Patronus charm-and in this one she produces an otter. It wouldn't be so terrible if had created in the Deathly Hollows film-and had it not been mentioned that she couldn't do the charm. This film is the least loyal to the novels, but it still keeps the main story intact. The wizarding battle of the Order and the Deatheaters was good, but it could've been more. The final battle of Voldermort and Dumbledore was grand-even if it went entirely against the novel-because it presented what two mages could do in a battle. Sadly, I would think that by now Harry would've developed the usage of more spells for defense. The editing of this film was good, and the effects do fit with the film. I also think it was quite satisfying to see what happened to Umbridge.

I give this film a 8 out of 10 stars. It's still a great film, but it just seems to fall short. The acting was good, but the story was lacking in spirit.

Answer to last blog: Schindler's List

Que: What three breeds of cats are present in the Harry Potter Franchise (Mrs. Norris, Professor McGonagall, and Crookshanks)?

Manx, Grey Tabby, and Persian
Ragdoll, Maltese, and Persian
Abyssinian, American Shorthair, and Persian
Maine Coon, British Shorthair, and Persian

Harry Potter & The Goblet of Fire

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


This is the fourth installment to the Harry Potter franchise. In this installment to the series, Harry is staying at Ron's house. He awakes to a few surprise's-such as Hermione's appearance. Harry and his friends attend the Quidditch world tournament. The tourment is soon terrified by the presence of Deatheater's. This carries onto to Hogwart's as it is announced that it will host the Twiwizard Tournament open for three schools. Harry's name surprisingly appears and forces him to become one of the contestants.

In this installment to the series the old cast returns once again with a new director, Mike Newell. This has moments of laughter, and then it will suddenly turn to drama. The film does follow the novel as good as it can-a few things get changed around to best fit the cinema. A few new faces appear among the students-Cedric Diggory (Robert Pattinson) and Cho Chang (Katie Leung). This film really develops the wizarding world that Harry is a part of. It is shown that magic is in all regions of the world. The Ministery's influence also becomes more apparent in this film. This film also does a great job in placing the story within the action of the plot-the Twiwizard Tournament. The acting is great, and the special effects are used to assist in telling the story. Voldermort also makes his first appearance as a flesh and bone character. Ralph Fiennes was chosen to be the actor to play him, and does an amazing job. He gives the character the right amount of wickedness and intelligence to give audience's shudders. The dragons came out great. The mermaids were unusual thought, but it worked for the film's sequence. The final challenge truly brought out an inner challenge from the character's themselves. The rising of Voldermort was well done as well.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! It's another great family film-even if it is dramatically dark.

Answer to last blog: Sleepy Hollow

Que: What other famous film has Ralph Fiennes appeared in?

Lord of the Rings
Titanic
Schindler's List
Jurassic Park

Harry Potter & The Prisoner of Azkaban

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


This is the third continuation to the Harry Potter franchise. In this continuation, as inspired by the novels, Harry is once again living with his aunt and uncle. He accidentally cause's his other aunt to blow up, and this cause's Harry to storm away from them and take a wizarding night bus to the Leaky Cauldron. Upon his arrival things have taken a dismal turn. Harry learns that Sirius Black has escaped, and he also learns that Black was a supporter of Voldermort. Harry continues onto Hogwart's, which has become home to Dementors. It is soon apparent that Black is after Harry, and will risk anything to get to him.

This film is under major scrutiny because of the new director, Alfonso Cuaron, and the new actor for Albus Dumbledore, Michael Gambon. The story has some elements change to best fit reel time. This part of the franchise is one of the more dramatic segments in the franchise. It's hard not to compare the two Dumbledore's. Gambon changes his presentation in that he present's the character's more humorous side while showing him as a very knowledgeable man. He does a great job stepping into the shoe's left behind by Richard Harris-even if it does feel slightly unusual at first. Sadly, this film was filmed during the awkward teenage years-it couldn't have been easy on the children actors. This film goes deeper into character development for several of the popular characters. It begins to show how much Dumbledore trusts Severus. It also shows a new group of character's from Harry's past-his father's friends, Remus Lupin, Peter Pettigrew, and Sirius Black. One major quirk with the film is the appearance of Lupin as a werewolf. Taking a new outlook on werewolves' is bold and very risky in film. In this film it didn't work out-the werewolf was too lanky. It made the werewolf look silly. The Dementors and the Hippogriff Buckbeak were well done. It's unfortunate that Buckbeak doesn't reappear in the film franchise. Otherwise, this was a great film. Taking the character's and placing them in normal clothing apart from the school uniform was a brilliant idea. I also enjoy the fact that in every film you see different area's of the Hogwart's school.

I give this film a 10 out of to stars! This is another great family film, even if it kind of dark. The acting was great, and the story was well performed.

Answer to last blog: Richard Harris

Question: In what other film did both actors, Michael Gambon (Albus Dumbledore) and Richard Griffiths (Vernon Dursley) make an appearance together?

The Ninth Gate
No Vacancy
The Insider
Sleepy Hollow

Harry Potter & The Chamber of Secrets

 Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


If you enjoyed reading my blog, please become a follower!


This was the most anticipated sequel to the highly popular film Harry Potter & The Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone. This film begins with Harry living with his aunt and uncle away from the wizarding world. A house elf pays him a visit that creates a small stir within the house. Harry is forbidden from going back to Hogwart's, but through a mischievous act by Ron, and his twin brothers, Harry escapes and returns to the wizarding world. There is an dark presence at Hogwart's, and it isn't long until muggle born's begin turning up petrified. It becomes a quest to save the muggle born's and keep the school from closing.

This book surprised most audience's because it was darker than the previous film. This film assisted in creating a solid foundation for the Harry Potter franchise. The old cast returned for this film, and new cast members arrive including a Ford Angelia. The actor chosen, Jason Isaacs, to portray Lucius Malfoy was a great choice. Kenneth Branagh arrives as the infamous Gilderoy Lockhart, and he did an excellent job with this character. However it was unfortunate that Richard Harris, Albus Dumbledore made his last appearance in this film. He created a gravitas impression of the character which made him seem very wise and knowledgable. The story remains as true to the novels as it can while fitting it to reel time. The plot develops more on what was mentioned in the first, and opens it up to the future films-future dangerous spells, feelings between Ron and Hermione,  and a different form of Voldemort. The effects add to the story greatly, and the use of lighting really brings aids in presenting the characters.

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! This is another great family film. It is a great sequel to the first, and it cemented the film series in film history.

Answer to last weeks blog: 11, 10, 12, 14 (Daniel, Emma, Rupert, and Tom)

Que: Who was the original actor to portray Albus Dumbledore in films I & II?

Michael Gambon
Richard Harris
Richard Griffiths
Ian McKellen

Harry Potter & The Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone

Caution: This Might Contain Spoilers!


Now, I am going to assume the most everyone has seen this film by now. If you haven't then your truly missing out on a great film! This is based off the popular novel by J.K. Rowling. This is the famous story of an orphaned boy who became something spectacular. After his parent's death to Lord Voldermort, Harry is taken to live with aunt and uncle in England. He is abused by his aunt because of her distaste for what her sister was. Harry had been unable to explain the strange occurrences that happened around him, and years later is unable to explain why he is forcibly receiving letters. Hagrid, a half giant, informs him that he is wizard and takes him to the legendary school of Hogwart's. In his first year he makes everlasting friendships, and begins to learn about his unspoken past.

This film is a landmark in film history because it popularized teenage novels being turned into film adaptations. This film also stirred a lot of controversy from religious organizations, and asked the question if film ruins the novel stories? Chris Columbus did an excellent job directing this film. He remained as true to the novels as he could possibly be. A few elements were changed around to better  fit reel time. In the film there were moments where future plots were suggested that an average film audience wouldn't know without having the novels. The music has become synonymous with the Harry Potter franchise. The children actors did a great job, and the adults were just as great. Alan Rickman brought a strong presence to an unpopular character. The unusual quirk is why did Ron receive more house points for a game chess then Hermione did for using intellect?

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! Otherwise, it's a great family film that shows a different form of love (other than the general romance love). A definite must see film for everyone. It is interesting that a stone save him fro death in the first story, and it was stone that saves him again in the final conclusion.

If you enjoy reading my blog please become a follower! ^_^

Answer to last blog post: Dead Silence

Que: How old was Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, and Tom Felton for the first Harry Potter film?

11, 10, 12, 14
11, 11, 12, 13
10, 12, 11, 14
11, 12, 10, 13

Insidious

Caution: This Might Contain spoilers!


Was Insidious-insidious? Well, the film took an interesting turn in the world of supernatural hauntings. A normal family moves into a house, and the spirit of the house torments the family. In this film, however, a family moves into a new house and odd things happen. But when their young son falls in the attic they think nothing of it-until he does not wake the next morning. Several spirits begin haunting the family, and during the passing of nights the hauntings become worse. The family soon finds out that the house is not haunted-instead it's their comatose son who is haunted.

This film has several moments where you jump. The chosen camera angels make it truly terrifying, and highly creepy. However, I would've preferred a better look for the demon. The nickname 'the man with fire on his face' was kind of lame. I was worried when I heard the lame tag line Insidious is insidious, but I was surprised. The story is generally creepy, and the acting really supports the build up of tension. The director James Wan is famous for his films Saw I and Saw III. This film takes a different route in horror-no gore! This is all thrill based horror. However, I am not surprised that the producer Oren Peli was involved with this film-coming off of Paranormal Activity. The opening music was really creepy, but the song choice that was played with the demon was... silly. One moment made me laugh was when the song was played and a figure was seen dancing to the song. It shouldn't have been humorous, but it took me aback for a second. The special effects were good and subtle. The gas mask worn by Elise Rainier was just odd. There really didn't seem to be a reason for the mask. If there was a reason it wasn't explained in the story. The ending probably would've been better had the ghosts not begin to cross over-that just became a bit too much. However, the final ending scene was a great choice because of the thrilling plot twist. I don't think this film will become a cult classic in horror, but it does offer some thrilling chills.

I give this film a 7 out of 10 stars. The camera angle's chosen gave the film a sinister look. The opening music was creepy, but the other music choices were odd and kind of silly. The demon could've had a better appearance, but the other ghosts were genuinely creepy. The plot was good, but got a bit cheesy at some moments.

Answers to last blog:
Alice in Wonderland (The Red Queen)
Pocahontas (New World)

Que: Besides Saw I and Saw III, what other horror film has James Wan directed?

The Boogyman
The Grudge
Dead Silence
The Eye

The King's Speech & Princess Kaiulani

Caution: This might contain spoilers!


This film surprised me in many ways. This film begins with a-you guessed it-a speech. Albert was assigned to give a king's speech at Wembley Stadium. He nervous begins, and his stutter appears as a prominent problem. Hoping to find a cure his wife seeks out the aid of someone who was recommended to her from a friend. His unusual methods turn out to be bold and brilliant. Events unfold and Albert soon finds himself in the seat of the king, and having to give one of his greatest speech's of all time.

I was amazed by this film. Admittedly I wasn't expecting to be so entertained. Most of the entertainment came from Geoffrey Rush's character Lionel Logue (who oddly reminds me of someone I know in real life-if he were British). I think this was a great acting choice for Rush, because it presents him as an actor who can perform other roles outside of action. I was also surprised to see Helena Bonham Carter playing the role of not only a sane housewife, but the role of a queen. Colin Firth also stood out in this film with his sensitivity to the character. This film is not heavy in drama, but it isn't gut splitting laughter either. It has moment's of both that are kept low key. This film is the story of how a king overcame his inner turmoil at the start of Britain's tribulation. The cinematography is kept dry, but it fits with the character's story. So, yay-a royal story with a happy ending! It's a change in that aspect compared to other royal films that have appeared in various films. 

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars! I found it to be a really heartfelt story that was also enjoyable. Even if the cinematography was dry-it was still worth it to watch it.

This was another surprising film about royalty. This film follows the story of a soon to be Chefess/Queen of the people of Hawi'i. However, at age seventeen the island falls into turmoil. American business owners begin protesting the Hawi'i royalty claiming that their rights were not accounted for. He father forcibly removes her from the turmoil and sends her to England to live with an old friend, and his family. 2 years later, she finds herself a young woman. She falls madly in love with the son of the man she lives with. It quickly becomes a choice between her country and love.

Okay, this was a great heartfelt film. However, this film was meant to come off differently. It was meant to be a political statement for the people of Hawi'i. In full honestly I can not say that this film delivers that political message. At it's core it's a love story that gets entangled with politics. Some of the true history was moved around-as can be expected-to best fit with reel time. Now, I believe that even if it doesn't deliver a political message it captures the inner beauty of Queen/Chefess Kaiulani. At the end I found myself really enamored by the character in general, and curious about her life. The Hawi'i landscape was beautifully shown in this film. I was glad to see the landscape change based on her location, and the placement within history. The script is simple, but can get slightly complex-if your not paying attention-due to some political situations. However, the words spoken really show the character's persona's.

I give this a 10 out of 10 stars. Even if it fails to provide the full political statement it was meant to-the love of the people involved in making the film really shows. It does a great job of presenting Kaiulani to audience's around the world.

P.S. I think it'd be good to see a film from Hawi'i's stand point when the greed of business manipulated politics to try and destroy of culture. I think it would better show the political hardship that was endured in the 1880's.

Answer to last weeks blog? South Korea

Questions for today's blog:

What other role features Helena Bonham Carter as a queen?

Sweeny Todd
Terminator Salvation
Alice in Wonderland
Planet of the Apes

What other role is the actress Q'orianka Kilcher (Kaiulani) most famous for?

Pocahontas (New World)
Paikea (Whale Rider)
Cindy Lou Who (How The Grinch Stole Christmas)
Donna Keppel (Prom Night)

The Warrior's Way

                                              Cation: This Might Contain Spoilers! 

The Warrior's Way is a film about an man who becomes the greatest swordsman in the world, and is about to murder his last enemy (a baby girl). In her laughter he found something, and ends up saving her from his clan. He goes to the west to find an old friend. Instead he finds a circus that's trying to rebuild itself. This films pretty much establishes itself as being too dramatic to be comical, and too comical to be dramatic within the first five minutes. It's told in a fable sort of way. The visual styling of this film is amazing, it's like a series of various painted pictures. However, the story gets to be too cartoony. The fighting scene's also are over done. For me, I felt this was a satire. The acting helped to keep the film interesting. This was an interesting choice of film for Geoffrey Rush to choose coming out of the Pirates franchise. However, this is a good choice for Dong-gun Jang-it'll open him up to American audience's and American filmmakers. It won't gain him much appeal, but it might lead to better roles in the future (in America). This will also, hopefully, open up opportunities for the first time director Sngmoo Lee.

I give this a 6 out of 10 stars. It has a good basis, but it falls short as the story continues to progress. The visual effects are amazing, but the action gets to be too cartoony. 

Last weeks answer: Chris Columbus.

New Question:

In what country is Dong-gun Jang renowned for his acting?

South Korea

China

North Korea

Japan

Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows: Pt. 1

Caution: This Contains Spoilers!


This is the first part to the conclusion of the Harry Potter series. I decided that I had to start by watching this one first-how could I see one part and wait on the other until I finished the other films. This film begins on a dark note. It begins with the Ministry of Magic in an uproar trying to protect it's wizard/Witch citizen's. Dumbledore has departed and left various items to Harry and his friends. Without any solid advice Harry and his friends are sent out to find the remaining Horcruxes and destroy them.

This part is as loyal as it can be to the novels. It makes subtle changes to better fit reel time. The acting really pulls out the emotional build-up that the story plot creates. The effects are well placed, and subtle. They add emphasis to the story rather than take away from it. There isn't much humor in this story-it's kept to a minimum. However, placing this one with part 2 opens up a few extra plot holes that weren't in the story-some of the plot holes are answered in the deleted scene's but not in the movie. Tonk's surprise isn't announced, or explained to clarify in either part of the series. This film is great as a build-up, but it does move at a slow pace. Which only makes it more confusing for part 2. As a stand alone film, its great. This film doesn't have too much action-just enough so that it works for the film. 

I give this film a 10 out of 10 stars. This film creates a great build-up for the sequel. It also, as a stand alone film, contains a great heartfelt story. 

Now for the film trivia question. Good luck! Last blog's Answer: A stone, a cloak, and a wand.

Que: Who directed the first Harry Potter film (and began the epic film saga)?

Chris Columbus

David Yates

Chris Nolan

Mike Newell

Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows: Pt. 2

Caution: This contains spoilers! This may also contain some adult language.


The famous cast returns for this epic conclusion to the first Harry Potter. Okay, first off-if your a book buff then you'll probably get really pissed off. This film is an instant continuation of Part 1, and sadly that means the entire first part was the build up. This entire film is Gringott's and the final battle that takes place within the Hogwart's castle-Voldemort is slightly obsessed with his old school. Surprisingly having cut out a lot of subtleties of the story, its run time was 130 minutes. However, the acting was great especially Alan Rickman's performance. He truly went above in this tale to present Severus' story with heart. Daniel also did a great performance. However, the ending was great cinematically but it could've been done a little better. Bellatrix's battle could've had some extra detail, and the final battle with Voldermort didn't convey what happened easily. It looked like Harry overpowered him and stole the wand, but the wand actually betrayed Voldermort by abandoning him. It was kind of rushed and probably would've benefited from keeping the films length (like the other films)-it's a really though call though. The effects were great for the wizarding battle though. The editing really pulled out the comical humor in some parts (particularly with Neville's epic battle moment). I enjoyed the film in general because of it's story, and coupled with part one it's truly awesome. I am left with only two questions for the plot: What happened to the third item of the Deathly Hollows? When was Hagrid captured by the enemy?

I give this film an 9 out of 10 stars. This film is all in all a great film to watch. You just have to separate it from the books. The plot holes make it odd in story, but the acting pulls the drama and slight humor into the spotlight. 


Okay, as part of my blogs I add in questions for fun movie trivia. I will once again add a question, answers can be placed in the comments sections. Good Luck! 


Answers to last blog questions: Janet Leigh & The Shape


New Question: What are the three items that make up the Deathly Hallows?


A wand, a cloak, and a book
A book, a snake, and a stone
A stone, a cloak, and a wand
A wand, a snake, and a diadem


P.S. I'll go back and review the previous Harry Potter films to fully end one of the films that began the epic film era. However, Twilight's ending films are coming out: that means bracing myself for sex, babies, and vampire eyes!

Halloween 1 & Halloween 2

 Okay, I'm probably going to get killed for this, but I did say I was going to review every movie-past and present.  So, since I'm going through a quick Halloween marathon-I might as well give a quick review.

 Halloween was a great horror film made in 1978.  It presented a new type of horror movie villain that jump started a series of slasher films. There is something to be said when a film can still make modern horror movie fans jump. It's catchy music, and remaining fear of the invincible monster made it a cult classic. However, the two leads made the horror convincing, but the other actor were decent. Some of the murder scene's do come out kind of comical. The plot, and script, are pretty straight forward and simple. Also, this is a horror film-that means no children should be watching it!

I give this film a 8 out of 10 stars.



Halloween II is a direct continuation of the first. It begins with the ending of the first-this became a common feature for early slasher films that has now disappeared. This doesn't carry same terrifying fear mainly because the fear of the ominous monster is gone. The murder scene's aren't as comedic, but get kind of cheesy. There is one great murder that stands out in its creativity. The acting from Jamie Lee Curtis and Donald Pleasence is great, but the other main actors get kind of cheesy. Since this is a horror film, please refrain from watching it in the presence of children!

I give this film a 7 out of 10 stars.



As a new feature, I am starting a poll system. I will post a question and let all of you comment in the correct answer. (See, if you know it from memory.) In my next blog post I will write in the correct answers. Since I reviewed two films I'll post two questions. Good luck.


Who is Jamie Lee Curtis' mother?


Janet Leigh 
Bette Davis
Lila Crane
Joan Crawford


What was the first name given to the villain in the Halloween films?

Michael Myers
Jason Voorhees
The Shape
The Shadow

Beastly

Okay, this film is classified as a chick flick. It takes the disney story of Beauty and the Beast and modernizes it and places it in high school. This film was loosely based off a novel by Alex Flinn (with the same title). This film has a great story, and manages to maintain a great plot-line through-out the film. The acting convey's the story very well, but it won't win an emmy. The effects were subtle, and visually great. The tattoo on his arm, a tree, was well done. The tattoo on his arm is the sign that shows how long he has to get someone to say the words 'I Love You'. It does subtle changes as time  progress', however I think the white roses could have been better done. The roses towards the end didn't look like a tattoo-more like it was colored in, or was a sticker. His other tattoo's were great, and his scars were pretty kewl as well. But the smaller scars around his nose didn't turn out as good. Mary-Kate Olsen plays Kendra, the witch, in this film. This was a great return to film for her. It'll re-establish her name to a familiar audience. Daniel Barnz is a brand-new director to film having only done one short, and one un-known film in 2008. The directing was well done for this film, and the editing was great. However, I believe that this film will only be seen by teenage girls, and women who believe that romance is waiting around the corner. The story is great, but the script was written for high school teenagers-so it probably won't be as  enjoyable to older audiences. This is more of a girlfriends over and watch a rented movie sort of thing. 


So, as a new feature to my criticism's, I'll be adding in a star rating for the films I watch. Without further adue, I rate this movie a 8 out of 10 stars. As great as it is, it doesn't hold much emotional intensity outside of high school popularity.  

Transformers Trilogy

I finally managed to sit down and watch all three films, or rather watch the first two and see the new one in theaters. I decided that since I watched all three I'd critique them as a group. Caution: May contain some spoilers.

Transformers follows the basic plot of the classic television series. Autobots and Decepticons are still at war even after the destruction of their home. However, their war has crossed onto our planet Earth. While following the classic story they further explore the idea of 'More Than Meets the Eye'. Sam Witwicky is the classic nerdy high school kid who can't get the girl (Mikaela). His father takes him to purchase a cheap car when one chooses him. It is revealed that his car is a transformer named Bumblebee (definitely Japanese-^_^). He is one of the soldiers that fights for the Autobots. The Decepticon's current mission is now to capture the Allspark to 'Punish and Enslave' Earth. Through a surprising turn of events Sam's grandfather came across the 'Ice Man' who places a map for the Allspark onto his grandfather's glasses. Sam is pulled into their war, and must attempt to assist the Autobots while getting the girl.


This film is a surprisingly believable story, and I was surprised that their was so much doubt about this film in the beginning. The effects were great for this action sci-fi flick. The transformations were made believable (for a car turned into a humanoid robot). Shia was a great pick for this film, and Megan Fox was... a kitten. She was picked, obviously, for her looks and not her acting ability. She didn't place much emotion into the acting, but the film editing really pulled it together. It made her acting look decent, but I was glad to find out that she did her stunts. Michael Bay did a great job taking this film from the, old toys, television series to film. There is also an ending epic battle-creating a great action conclusion.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is the sequel to the first Transformers film. It brings back many of the old favorite characters, Autobots, and Decepticons. It also features three female Autobots (or one female Autobot-depending on how far you go back with the Transformer story)... ^_^ (The ARCEE Sisters). In this one the Decepticons have found a new way to enslave Earth. They need the coordinates that will lead them to a device that belonged to the Prime's. Bumblebee and Mikaela get left behind as Sam goes to college, but not forgotten. A piece of the Allspark was left in his jacket, and managed to leave an imprint on his mind that would lead the Transformers to the device. Once again Sam is pulled back into the war to help protect Earth.


This is a great sequel to the first. It brings back the old cast, and presents some new ones. It also features a new Decepticon called the Devastator. This creature is massive and highly dangerous. It was worth the effort and time to place him into the film. I must also confess that I was surprised at how well tanned all the actors were in this film. I enjoyed the changing landscape from America to Egypt. I'm also glade that the film kept as much of the old cast as possible. The film showed respect to the old Transformers iterations with a robotic cat and nano transformers. This one does not disappoint with the ending epic battle.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon is the third part of the series. This film will entice fans of the other two films. As a reverse of the the second film, Sam is living life wishing he could become a hero once again. Sam's new girlfriend, Carly, wants him to be normal. Either way the Decepticon's new plan is unfolding. The Decepticon's and Autobot's learn about Cybertron (Internet Movie Data Base called it Cybertonian?) that was hidden on the dark side of the moon. Earth space explorers discovered it first, and were afraid of its contents. The war takes a new turn as the Autobots and the Decepticons fight for their old home, or for Earth.


This has a very familiar story line with a few new turns. If you hate repetition, you might get slightly frustrated, but this is still a great film. The effects are amazing, and the new Decepticon (Shockwave) is wicked. Sadly, you will find yourself comparing the old and new actress, Megan Fox and Rosie Huntington-Whitley. Opinions will vary based on preference. However, everyone still asks the question of what happened to Mikaela? There is never a real definitive answer. At first I was worried that the acting persona's were going to be over the top. They had a familiar actor Ken Jeong (surprisingly) from... the Hangover... ? He did get to be much for the films dark action tone, but his part ends with enough dark humor to eclipse it. Simmons makes a reappearance and I must confess following all three films shows his amazing transformations. He begins as a agent in the first film. He turns into a butcher, with his mother living with him, who posts alien conspiracies on the web in the second film. In the third installment, he's a famous bookseller with a unique body guard.


This one also goes further into the idea of the governments fear of the robotic aliens being on their planet. It also goes deep into the idea of who is a villain and who is a hero. Since we're humans we view anyone who fights for Earth as a hero. However, in this one the Autobot's actually fight against their old home and the Decepticon's are fighting for the survival of their old home (even if it does make mankind slaves). It is a really tough call when really thought about. Either way, the film turned out great in the end-even with it's length (157 minutes-go with an empty bladder). The ending battle is still epic, and many of the old favorite characters return in this film (Except for the surviving ARCEE Sisters...Sister?). It is definitely worth viewing at least once.

The Adjustment Bureau

Okay, this is at its core a love story, but it also boarders philosophical with a pint of action. I can see why this film was popular among movie goers, and I don't blame them. This film plays with the notion of chance occurrence -like a coffee spill, or the cop that won't stop questioning you. It also answers the question of why so many men wear hats in New York (^_^). I enjoyed this take on how love will conquer all obstacles, and at the same time enjoyed the thought of chance vs. being forced onto a chosen path. It does have dramatic moments, but its not overdrawn. The acting is great and all the effects are well placed (almost unnoticeable). 

Drive Angry & Battle: Los Angeles

Here is the two newest movies I've seen today, Drive Angry and Battle: Los Angeles. 

Drive Angry was a unique story line, and filled with great actors. If your into the old 70's style of film, or just a Nicholas cage fan you'll love this film. However, the 70's film style does make it cheesy at times-especially when it comes to the action scenes. It was also odd watching Billy Burke (Charlie Swan-Twilight Saga and Cesaire-Red Riding Hood) playing the role of the satanic leader. It was also unusual having the lead be a bad ass damsel in distress-it worked, but it was unusual. 

Battle: Los Angeles presented a new take on hostile alien take over. Instead of the overused perspective of a group of people, it's shown through a group of marine soldiers who are fighting to save their water resources. Los Angeles is the last remaining human shore that is being taken over. The acting is phenomenally done, and you feel greatly for the characters. It was done so that it appeared believable. The effects were well done and kept minimal. I also find it enjoyable to see Michelle Rodriguez playing her usual role as the bad ass fighter. It was also nice to see Aaron Eckhart playing a character so different from Harvey Dent. This is a must see for action movie goers. 

X-Men First Class & Sucker Punch

Okay, I'm tired of all these film critiques giving the worst reviews I've seen. I haven't been able to read, or follow, any of them because they never really tell the logic behind their opinions-except that I hate it or love it. So, I'm going to post up my reviews on facebook, and hopefully it'll be a little more informative. 

I saw these two films on July 5: X-Men First Class and Sucker Punch.

Now, X-Men was a prequel to the film series X-Men (and X-Men Origins). If you're a fan of the comic series you probably won't enjoy the film. I've been informed how the character Emma Frost was... well changed by a lot. They made her as a villain when she ought to be good. As an individual film it's great. It's got a gripping story line and a great visual style. The effects were also well done, and fit in well with the story plot. The acting was really spectacular for this film as well. It made the characters very believable. Now, as a series it's bad. If you come straight off X-Men origins it creates a confusing time frame. This would have been better if it was just a reboot of the franchise, but since it's a prequel (with a cameo of Hugh Jackmen), it fails. Apart from not knowing if Emma Frost was portrayed twice (once at the end of X-Men Origins and then as the 'older' villain in X-Men First Class), or if it's meant to be an entirely different character (who just happens to also have skin made of diamonds as well...). Also Xaviar seems to change from film to film (Origins and First Class)-which makes me wonder how the time frame is meant to be perceived. I was also slightly disheartened that there wasn't an ending after credits clip like other Marvel Comics.

Okay, I can see why this film got bad reviews from other critiques. it's a very unique story idea and those tend to be viewed as bad. The visual styling for this film is beautifully done. The acting is also well done-I could feel the characters. However it takes at least roughly 30 minutes to get a grasp on the plot, but the ending really ties the story together well. It's not a film for children obviously. It's also very dramatic-so don't expect many laughs. The action was a bit good, but slightly off. It gets away with a lot because most of the film is set within her mind-and anything can happen there. The Lord of the Rings reference threw me off, but it worked out well. This does take a leap into imagination, but I enjoyed the film.